The New Terrorists: You and I

The New Terrorists: According to the Department of Human Sacrifice, I mean the NKVD, I mean DHS. :) (See attached)

Read More......

HR 45 and the fall of "Western Civilization"

Ladies and Gentlemen, I just had to take a moment to pass along the following information and to say once again, we are so screwed...

OBAMA SIGNS BILLS AND CREATES NEW LAWS DISARMING AMERICANS NATIONWIDE AND SUBMITS US LAWS TO UNITED NATIONS CONTROL

OBA-HUSSEIN-KHOMEINI, making sure that he makes the Constitutional right to bear arms by new legislation totally impossible,

H E R E- I T- C O M E S !!! - HR45 Gun Licensing Bill
HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009

… this is “Obama’s Gun Control by Secrecy”.

Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.

We heard this yesterday on the Peter Boyles radio program.

Even gun shop owners didn’t know about this because it is flying under the radar.

To find out about this go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information.

Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless: It is registered.

You are fingerprinted.

You supply a current Driver’s License.

You supply your Social Security #.

You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing.

Each update - change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25.

Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail.

There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18.

The Government would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 years in prison.

The gun owner’s license would expire in 5 years and would not automatically renew.

If you think this is a joke - go to the website and take your pick of many options to read this …

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/textIt is lengthy.

But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along.

FAILURE TO DO SO AT YOUR PERIL!

This is just a “termite” approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we have no defense - chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it.

It’s another example of the slowly-boiled frog: put a frog in a pan of water and slowly heat it; the frog will be boiled to death without realizing it. This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not. The Second Amendment: America’s original homeland security.

You may phone the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. A switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office you request.

ALSO

Just received this from a friend. Haven’t heard anything about this from the NRA, etc:

I don’t know if you are aware of this but Obama signed the treaty on guncontrol with the UN…everyone must start now contacting their Senators to tell them not to ratify this treaty.

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin507.htmhttp://gunowners.org/a042109.htmhttp://gunowners.org/fs0901.htm

Please pass this on to everyone you know so that they may start contactingtheir Senators

Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading

– Even BB guns could be on the chopping block

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Remember CANDIDATE Barack Obama? The guy who “wasn’t going to take away our guns”? Well, guess what?

Less than 100 days into his administration, he’s never met a gun he didn’t hate.

A week ago, Obama went to Mexico, whined about the United States, and bemoaned (before the whole world) the fact that he didn’t have the political power to take away our semi-automatics. Nevertheless, that didn’t keep him from pushing additional restrictions on American gun owners.

It’s called the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

To be sure, this imponderable title masks a really nasty piece of work.

First of all, when the treaty purports to ban the “illicit” manufacture of firearms, what does that mean?

1. “Illicit manufacturing” of firearms is defined as “assembly of firearms [or] ammunition … without a license….” Hence, reloading ammunition — or putting together a lawful firearm from a kit — is clearly “illicit manufacturing.”

Modifying a firearm in any way would surely be “illicit manufacturing.” And, while it would be a stretch, assembling a firearm after cleaning it could, in any plain reading of the words, come within the screwy definition of “illicit manufacturing.”

2. “Firearm” has a similarly questionable definition. “[A]ny other weapon” is a “firearm,” according to the treaty — and the term “weapon” is nowhere defined.

So, is a BB gun a “firearm”? Probably. A toy gun? Possibly. A pistol grip or firing pin? Probably. And who knows what else.

If these provisions (and others) become the law of the land, the Obama administration could have a heyday in enforcing them. Consider some of the other provisions in the treaty:

* Banning reloading.

BANNING SALE OF BRASS, ALREADY FIRED, CARTRIDGES BY THE MILITARY TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS IN PROCESS AND HAS BEEN LURCHED BACK AND FORTH AND WAS PREVENTED FROM TAKING EFFECT BUT NOW SEEMS TO HAVE COME BACK TO LIFE.

In Article IV of the treaty, countries commit to adopting “necessary legislative or other measures” to criminalize illicit manufacturing and trafficking in firearms. Remember that “illicit manufacturing” includes reloading and modifying or assembling a firearm in any way.

This would mean that the Obama administration could promulgate regulations banning reloading on the basis of this treaty — just as it is currently circumventing Congress to write legislation taxing greenhouse gases.

* Banning gun clubs. Article IV goes on to state that the criminalized acts should include “association or conspiracy” in connection with said offenses — which is arguably a term broad enough to allow, by regulation, the criminalization of entire pro-gun organizations or gun clubs, based on the facilities which they provide their membership.

* Extraditing US gun dealers. Article V requires each party to “adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offenses it has established in accordance with this Convention” under a variety of circumstances.

We know that Mexico is blaming U.S. gun dealers for the fact that its streets are flowing with blood. And we know it is possible for Mexico to define offenses “committed in its territory” in a very broad way. And we know that we have an extradition obligation under Article XIX of the proposed treaty.

So we know that Mexico could try to use the treaty to demand to extradition of American gun dealers. Under Article XXIX, if Mexico demands the extradition of a lawful American gun dealer, the U.S. would be required to resolve the dispute through “other means of peaceful settlement.”

Does anyone want to risk twenty years in a sweltering Mexican jail on the proposition that the Obama administration would apply this provision in a pro-gun manner?

* Microstamping.

Article VI requires “appropriate markings” on firearms. And, it is not inconceivable that this provision could be used to require microstamping of firearms and/or ammunition — a requirement which is clearly intended to impose specifications which are not technologically possible or which are possible only at a prohibitively expensive cost.

* Gun registration.

Article XI requires the maintenance of any records, for a “reasonable time,” that the government determines to be necessary to trace firearms. This provision would almost certainly repeal portions of McClure-Volkmer and could arguably be used to require a national registry or database.

ACTION: Write your Senators and urge them to oppose the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

Folks, this measure has, so far, flown in completely under the radar. Be afraid.

Read More......

Better off without You

Better off without You

Unlike the wonderfully super intelligent academics on the left… I the Grand Fubba will not lie to you. The world may or may not be a better place if you start holding your breath right now. Go ahead… we are all waiting. After all, that carbon dioxide you are exhaling is killing the environment. And don’t you dare think about letting it slip out the other end… all that methane.

After reading an article on www.livescience.com I have found that this is exactly what the journalist over there really thinks. Sure Andrea Thompson tried really hard to push the points of global warming in a manner that her liberal comrades would appreciate. Sure she tried really hard to stick to the basics… with all her side’s unproven theories and obscure “facts”. But it still comes down to this one point… we would all be better off without you (or just a lot less of your type).

Lets face it… humans like to pollute these days. We have just grown accustomed to buying a plastic bottle of pop and tossing it out about five minutes later (some of us might feel guilty and “recycle”). Society as a whole has shaped us and molded us to be consumers… sorta the way this economy works. So why would the left be so upset with our “natural” inclinations toward consumerism?

Well besides the left’s love for communism and Obamanism, they really just need control over our everyday lives. It Obama could set there right behind you while you read this… sorry bad example, he would just shut your computer off. But anyhow… if Clinton… sorry, still stuck on the black president bit. Anyway… if a liberal could dictate your every move from the moment you wake up to the moment you went to sleep they would, and they would love it.

But that is all hoopla for the real reason why liberals love global warming. See, all sorts of people love to feel good about themselves. When we lay our heads down at night we like to feel like we are important in some way. So thusly liberals need things like global warming and gay marriage to secure their warm fuzzy feelings… they can’t help it they are hollow inside. Thusly they adopt ideas like this one without any idea what it really entails (ironically these are the same people who hate religion).

What does global warming entail? Glad you asked, I the Grand Fubba just happen to know.

Global warming is many things to many people. For the liberal it is a way to expand government in the face of a “doomsday” scenario (once again ironic… didn’t they complain about President George W. Bush doing this?). Yet for the politician this means fattening their paychecks while we struggle against this monumental task. And for the hippie, this is a wet dream they have been having for nearly 50 years.

However, for each of the three classes it still comes back to control. Global warming is meant to strip us of our freedoms the Constitution has laid out for us. With less and less of our God given rights we are to be more subordinate to people like Obama. When they say jump we are to ask how high. And sadly that last sentence is hardly an exaggeration.

Every policy this new (hundred year old… sorry hundred day old) administration has laid out has been leading up to Obama’s “climate change” initiatives. In the coming days we will see our freedoms be crossed out one by one as Obama finds new ways to violate the Constitution (which he could never uphold in the first place). But like Limbaugh says… elections have consequences. Only unlike during Clinton’s misuse of the oval office, this time we more to loose.

We need to protest his every action louder than the liberals did over the last eight years. We need to annoy them every waking moment for the rest of Obama’s so called presidency. We need to spread discontent all across this nation as this man continues to rule like a dictator. If it was good enough for the liberals… well its really not my idea of politics… its good enough for me.

So the next time you see your favorite liberal, remind him or her that “we would all be better off without you” (and if you happen to be talking about global warming it really seems to grind their gears). Read More......